U.S., allies strike targets in Libya

Clara Oswald

Oswin!
Staff member
Joined
Jan 12, 2005
Messages
4,648
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
By ROBERT BURNS, AP National Security Writer

WASHINGTON – U.S. and British ships and submarines launched the first phase of a missile assault on Libyan air defenses Saturday and a senior American defense official said it was believed substantial damage was inflicted.

In the strikes, 112 Tomahawk cruise missiles were fired at more than 20 coastal targets to clear the way for air patrols to ground Libya's air force.

While U.S. defense officials cautioned that it was too early to fully gauge the impact of the onslaught, the official said that given the precision targeting of the Navy's cruise missiles, they felt that Libya's air defenses suffered a good deal of damage.

Explosions continued to rock the coastal cities, including Tripoli. Navy Vice Adm. Wiliam E. Gortney, director of the Pentagon's Joint Staff, would not discuss future operations But defense officials said military action was likely to continue.

The official spoke on grounds of anonymity because the ongoing mission.

In announcing the mission during a visit to Brazil, President Barack Obama said he was reluctant to resort to force but was convinced it was necessary to save the lives of civilians. He reiterated that he would not send American ground troops to Libya.

"We cannot stand idly by when a tyrant tells his people there will be no mercy," he said in Brasilia.

While U.S. defense officials said it was too early to gauge the impact of the onslaught, one senior official said that given the precision targeting of the Navy's cruise missiles, they believe Libya's air defenses suffered a good deal of damage.

It was clear the U.S. intended to limit its role in the Libya intervention, focusing first on disabling or otherwise silencing Libyan air defenses, and then leaving it to European and perhaps Arab countries to enforce a no-fly zone over the North African nation.


Source: First wave of allied assault: 112 cruise missiles - Yahoo! News
 
well...at least the "international community" didnt wait until millions were dead like they did during the situation in Germany in WW2, still, I would prefer if the UK and France had taken the lead on this. The U.S. needs to stop meddling so much in the affairs of the Middle East. Gadafi is a tyrant and should be taken down...but by the people of the land. he's a coward too. he's recruiting mercenaries and other killers from outside countries to do his dirty work!

and who believed that "cease fire" bullshit yesterday? LOL it didnt even last 24 hrs.
 
Isn't there a no-fly zone in effect too, aren't we suppose to be staying out of international incidents like this
 
i dont think it was a bad idea for the u.s. to be involved to a degree...but definately should NOT be leading any kind of war effort. we are involved in too many middle eastern conflicts already and how is it that our gov't is so QUICK to go to the aid of these people (not saying they dont need help but still) but are sitting here cutting funds/programs for our OWN people who need help? shit...somebody needs to save US from the tyranny of the republican/tea party
 
Back
Top