Miley Cyrus' controversy and its implications

Rampage

I am a fucking god.
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
2,695
Location
Wilmington, NC
This is from Newsweek:


Let's take Miley off the barbecue for this saucy satin-sheet Vanity Fair photo that's causing all the noise right now and move on to what I, anyway, think is a far more disturbing shot in the spread: the one of Big Daddy, Billy Ray Cyrus, and his daughter Miley. Like a Disney wish sprung straight from Cinderella's castle, Miley lies in all her precocious glory across her beefcake father's lap. His sleeveless right arm drapes protectively (suggestively?) around her right shoulder and reaches down to hold her hand. A hipbone pokes out below her bare midriff, and Billy Ray's Harlequin-like hair ripples out after him. The schism is immediate: they are father and daughter, yet they look like lovers … but they're father and daughter. I have been a 15-year-old daughter, and I can tell you with reinforced steel-studded certainty, there is no way I would ever pose in such a manner for a photograph (and in the age-appropriate parlance, let me just say, "Ick")—unless someone was paying me a billion dollars. Well, wait just a minute. That's right—Disney's hottest commodity is already well on her way to billionaire status, thanks to the Hannah Montana franchise, including the million-dollar-grossing sold-out tours and the Hannah Montana movie she's set to shoot this summer, as well as the de rigueur next step for young Hollywood: the clothing line. And, of course, the fragrance line (you're nobody until everybody smells just like you). So maybe we shouldn't be surprised that when you're playing the lucky cards you've been dealt, that means you sometimes have to recline over your father's jean-strapped thighs and give a pout as only you and the Olsen twins can and call it a day. After all, Miley—and Hannah Montana—can't stay 15 forever. She'll age out of the demographic that has carried her on its fragile butterfly- and ballerina-loving shoulders, and then what? Billions can only beget billions if someone's paying for it.

Right now Vanity Fair photographer Annie Leibovitz may be wondering how she could have once gotten Whoopie Goldberg into a tub full of milk for a photograph but is finding herself in hot water now over the Miley photographs. A message posted on Vanity Fair's Web site wants people to judge for themselves: "Our exclusive video shows that the session was a relaxed family event in the picturesque hills of Calabasas, California." Miley's statement is more deflecting, "I took part in a photo shoot that was supposed to be 'artistic' and now, seeing the photographs and reading the story, I feel so embarrassed. I never intended for any of this to happen and I apologize to my fans who I care so deeply about."

Satin Sheetgate has prompted the second apology in two weeks from Miley, who last week put up the mea culpa for shots that surfaced on the Internet of herself in various suggestive poses: pulling down her shirt to show off her green bra in one, cuddling up to a boy with her stomach exposed in another. The photo in question now in Vanity Fair is of Miley who appears to be nude, clutching a satin sheet to her chest. Scarlet lips, dark flowing hair and a knowing look, and sure, there you have "Lolita Does Disney." Celebrity sniper-blogger Perez Hilton has already christened her "Slutty Miley" on his Web site. But at the time did Miley think it was too provocative? Or was it a case of getting under the mind control of the famed photographer? Leibovitz has released the following statement: "I'm sorry that my portrait of Miley has been misinterpreted," she says. "Miley and I looked at fashion photographs together and we discussed the picture in that context before we shot it. The photograph is a simple, classic portrait, shot with very little makeup, and I think it is very beautiful."

If Miley were just some neophyte who hadn't already appeared on "Oprah" and the "Barbara Walters 2008 Oscar Special" as well as in countless other magazine shoots, one might entertain the thought that she'd somehow been "manipulated" during the shoot, as a Disney spokesperson is claiming. But her parents attended and monitored the shoot. And Miley herself is by now well steeped in the maneuverings of celebrity. Witting or unwitting, she should have known better. And she plainly did not see the backlash coming until too late.

The ironic thing—there has to be an irony here somewhere, right?—is that Miley was supposed to be the last great hope. With Britney and Lindsay making the rounds of rehab and back again, Miley was the shimmering example of how to keep it together. Or at least not to lose the plot so severely, and so quickly. For now, at least, the girl who found fame by singing about the "Best of Both Worlds" has learned, maybe the hard way, that it's not always as simple as changing from one costume to the other—or out of one.

© 2008



The questions I have for you guys are as follows (with some observations mixed in):

Do you think Miley and family were actually "fooled"? Or did they miscalculate and now are trying to cover their tracks?

What is you opinion of what I see as the growing sexualization of Miley Cyrus? In my opinion, one dirty secret in this country is that far too many men (a solid plurality, I believe) would sleep with her if they could, unfortunately. One bit of evidence to support this viewpoint should be the fact that a large percentage of teenage pregnancies are from men in their 20s. The number is not known due to fear of prosecution, but the evidence is that it could be significant. So, in THAT case, these pics are actually a DESIRED commodity.

One point made by the writer is the sexual tension she perceived in a photograph of Miley with her father. I have tried to ignore that level of cybicism, but it seems as if they act like Mom doesn't exist and its just those two. That seems to allude to a stylized Electra complex perpetrated by either the media or by the family itslef, on purpose or by accident. What do you guys think?
 
To be honest i haven't seen the picture or followed any of this so far but it does seem like this could be a miscalculation on the part of the family. I think very disturbing of the sexualization of a 15-6 yr old. I know most of these Teen Idols are trying to grow up fast and make the jump to "adult" fame but now its starting to get a little disturbing. This can't be healthy mental for them or the fans watching them.
 
Vanity Fair isnt some sleazy tabloid affair. This is a long established, well respected fashion/social magazine and you can beat that they didnt deliberately mislead or fool Miley Cyrus into any kind of situation. Not only that but her FATHER has been notorious for "watching out for her" every step of the way and yet here you find HIM in some of these photos too.

if anything this was a miscalculation on Miley (and her father's) part. Vanity Fair is a magazine KNOWN for its cutting edge, sexy, yet artfull, and tastefull imagery. She's 15 years old! what teenager that age DO YOU KNOW that reads Vanity Fair? I think her management (aka her father) was so busy pimping her out the way Jessica and Ashlee's father is known for doing that he got carried away.

as for her "sexualized" image? hello, didnt we see this several years ago with Lindsay Lohan as men across the country began obsessing over her breasts while she was still 16/17? Miley is headed down that same path...and it may not even be her choosing. Just because she's a Disney Darling now doesnt mean she will stay a "sweetheart" for ever. Lindsay Lohan as a Disney Darling too, as was Britney Spears. The ONLY Disney Darling who seems to be in control of her destiny right now is Raven Symone and I really have to give it to her for that.
 
Hannah Montana showing some back? Meh.

that's the best you could come up with? :rolleyes:


Miley Cyrus is no different than any other teen idol pumped out of the Disney Machine, yet somehow she's suddenly so "convicted" about this photo shoot, when in which her dad participated in? give me a break.

If she doesnt start thinking/doing for herself, she's going to go the same route is Britney and Lindsay...OR worse, she'll fade into obscurity without even knowing she's a has been like Hillary Duff aka Lizzie Maguire.
 
That says more about how morally bankrupt our society is than anything else. We get all pissed off about the oversexualization of a 15 yr. old, but we don't look at the practices and capitalistic ideologies that put her there.

Any parent that subjects their kid to this kind of media spotlight is only doing so for the money, and unfortunately, it's being done to the detriment of their child. It's not so much about the demands of the audience as it is the allure of fortune and glory.
 
what's upsetting to me is not even Miley Cyrus or her photo shoot, but the legions of SICK men out there (a certain large comic based forum for example) who are going spastic insane over pictures of a 15 year old girl. this child aint even CLOSE to being "legal" yet and they have like a 10 page thread devoted to "Miley Cyrus topless photos" , its a damn shame and you know that there are more men like that the world over.

her father ought to be ashamed of himself for putting her out there like this. he's no better than Jessica and Ashlee Simpson's father.
 
eh...thing is, it isn't really a new thing (the photo, composition, subject..etc). So many are done like that all the time, and get considered art..or nice. Few may think it's a bit disturbing sexually. But because it's Miley Cyrus and father it's 'omg!! wrong!!!!!!!' Heck. I can go right now to my 'Best in Photography' books for the past few years from a few journals and pull out TONS that should get more of an uprising then that, if the Miley picture is so damn upsetting. Crap..surprised there isn't a riot in that case. Oh! While i'm at it, should go find my art history books..TONS of paintings done in a similar vein that are considered valuable works of art in museums now.
 
Not going to say to someone that can't be considered art but the use of a 15 yr old as the model in this day and age was a very suspect move. The line between what can be considered fine art and moral bankrupt is hair thin.
 
I don't see the big deal here honesty. Yes, she's fifteen years old but does anyone remember Brooke Shields in her infamous Levis Jean Commercial in the '80's? She was like what seventeen or something? Then there was an actress (I think Jodie Foster?), who played a prostitute at the age of eleven who did full frontal nudity.

This type of provocativeness has been going on for a few decades. Maybe not as risque as this generation but it obviously had to stem from somewhere. Celebrities today aren't dumb they know sex sells no matter what the age.

I remember Britney on her Rolling Stone (I think it was RS) cover and how she was only seventeen or something and they too discussed her breasts. Britney continues to utilize her sex appeal even stars like Hilary Duff are stepping it up to allure more fans to their music.

Maybe I'm too forward or too controversial but as Farrah said this isn't some sleazy magazine. Its tasteful and sexy. They knew what they were getting themselves into.
 
Cat-Scratch
Cat-Scratch
Well Said
I don't see the big deal here honesty. Yes, she's fifteen years old but does anyone remember Brooke Shields in her infamous Levis Jean Commercial in the '80's? She was like what seventeen or something? Then there was an actress (I think Jodie Foster?), who played a prostitute at the age of eleven who did full frontal nudity.

This type of provocativeness has been going on for a few decades. Maybe not as risque as this generation but it obviously had to stem from somewhere. Celebrities today aren't dumb they know sex sells no matter what the age.

I remember Britney on her Rolling Stone (I think it was RS) cover and how she was only seventeen or something and they too discussed her breasts. Britney continues to utilize her sex appeal even stars like Hilary Duff are stepping it up to allure more fans to their music.

Maybe I'm too forward or too controversial but as Farrah said this isn't some sleazy magazine. Its tasteful and sexy. They knew what they were getting themselves into.


I remember all of that PLUS Brooke's Blue Lagoon movie kerfluffle.
Good call all around.
 
Back
Top