Michael Jackson's progeny?

[DonDaddyD]

Disclaimer: It doesn't matter, no really it really doesn't matter; he loved them and that's all that matters. We are all one race Homo Sapien, some of us have other human evolutionary off-shoot DNA in us, nearly everyone above the Sahara has some Neanderthal DNA, most Africans sub-Sahara don't. Some would claim that the dominant white skin DNA was inherited from Neanderthals (who had white skin) that interbred with Homo Sapien's (who had black skin). Interesting and possibly factual, I'm just stirring the pot for this:

Do you think Michael Jackson is the biological father of his 'children'

Now then lets clear this up, I'm using the English terminology of defining ethnicity:

Black in this case African and/or Caribbean origin (aka African American).

Mixed race / Bi-racial (In this case the offspring of a black man/woman [see above] and white woman/man - think, if Farrah had my babies)

White (Caucasian)

So;

Michael Jackson was black

His baby mum is white.

His children should be: mixed race.

Now if a time traveler appeared before me around the time Thriller dropped and showed me this picture (below) and said these were Michael Jackson's biological children, I would be laughing right through to 2020.

3T, these kids aint.

When MJs kids were younger, I was like "let's wait and see how they turn out". We all had our doubts though; so is it OK to say that they aren't his kids, is the subject still taboo or do you think they are his biological kids?

 

[Clara Oswald]

I never really questioned it, and I don't really care lol. I feel like he would have done paternity tests at least for the first one.

In the end they're his kids, whether he's their father or not, and it's possible the mother's traits just dominated. A girl I went to high school with is mixed race but doesn't look "black" and used to get teased about it, because people said she was lying about her dad being black.

 

[DonDaddyD]

But it's like they're lying to the World and we just have to accept it. Not even question it even though the truth is staring us in the face.

It's not even so much that they don't look like Michael Jackson (my own son is really light skinned - looks like me when I was his age) they are devoid of nearly all African/Caribbean genetic traits.

 

[Clara Oswald]

Well, honestly, it's none of our business who their biological parent is. Some people adopt children and don't tell them they are adopted - it's no different than that.

They're not some random people that came out of the woodwork claiming to be MJ's kids - he raised them before his death so it doesn't matter, he's still their dad.

 

[Karma]

This is an interesting topic. It's something that's always out there but more ppl don't seem to discuss it.


Paris looks like she could be Madonna's daughter, she favors Lourdes (Madonna's daughter) a bit. The elder Prince doesnt look like he has any "family resemblance" to the Jacksons & "Blanket" doesnt either really. 3T (MJ's nephews in that other pic) definitely had more of the Jackson traits in their facial features.

I think there's a possibility that MJ is the biological father, but it's remote. More than likely, as Clara suggested, he may have adopted them. He certainly had the money & means to arrange for that to happen. I've wondered about it before b/c it does seem strange that the children have NO TRACE of the "Jackson" look in them. If they are MJ's genetic children, those facial features are so strong, surely they would show in some way, even though the children are "light skinned".